Today we announced that Coupa has been Gartner Magic Quadrant for Procure-to-Pay Suites for Indirect Procurement 2015*, based on our “ability to execute” and our “completeness of vision."positioned by Gartner, Inc. in the Leaders quadrant of the
We’re pleased to be positioned in the leaders quadrant, and also humbled. But, most importantly, we see this as an immense responsibility that we do not take lightly.
Anybody would feel that way. If a colleague tells you that you have a great sense of fashion, you're not going to come to the office in sweatpants the next day. You feel you've just been validated, so you're going to continue what you’ve been doing, only take it up a notch.
That’s how we feel about being in the leaders’ quadrant. We feel proud today, and determined to do even better tomorrow.
Our vision for this marketplace is for allcompanies to be able to bring 100% of their spend under management, so they have the opportunity optimize every dollar, euro and pound spent for savings they can use to further their own company vision.
Our responsibility is to continue to execute on three guiding principles in order to make our vision a reality.
The first is to understand the obstacles that companies across every industry share to seeing, and optimizing, all of the spending that's happening in their organization. The idea, in 2015, of only having visibility into ten to forty percent of spend is unacceptable.
We're going to continue to remove obstacles to spend visibility and provide high-integrity data that informs smarter spending decisions at every point of transactional procurement, expenses, and invoicing processes.
We want to get paid fairly for providing what we’re calling Savings as a Service, but we’re not going to do it by monetizing the supplier base. We are committed to giving suppliers multiple options for transacting with buyers in Coupa, with no fees and a minimum of friction.
We are also going to maintain our maniacal focus on reimagining the end user experience from one in which people have to be pushed to transact using friction-filled systems to one where each and every employee would rather use Coupa to responsibly spend the company's money than any other alternative.
And, we will renew our commitment to being the only software vendor in the marketplace with a pre-integrated, organically developed transactional solution that allows customers to realize immediate value, along with the ability to easily switch on new capabilities to uncover new opportunities to optimize spend.
The Coupa Suite brings all of your spending – procurement, expenses and invoicing – together as a whole, for a single version of the truth across the organization. You can see all the purchases that are pre-approved, post-approved and unapproved in one place. You can kick off a reverse auction to source items when you see spend hit a certain level. You can see inventory of all the items you bought in real time. It’s a completely integrated world.
At the same time, we recognize the need to integrate with legacy ERP systems to help companies get more value out of these investments, and we’ve made it so Coupa can be deployed as a strategic extension to any existing system.
Think of it as a Netflix strategy. The latest TVs are shipped with Netflix already integrated. Netflix is a complete viewing experience on its own, but you no longer have to have a separate setup for it. All of that friction has been removed. It’s become a strategic extension to your TV.
All of these efforts will be informed by Coupa’s core values: Ensure customer success, focus on results, and strive for excellence. We want to continue to change the dialog in our industry from one of vendor/customer finger pointing to one that is centered around success. To that end, we will continue to carefully select only the best, brightest, and most passionate people to join us, and our cause.
Our vision will come to fruition when thousands of companies -- large, medium, and small -- are able to instantaneously articulate how they are getting real, measurable financial value by partnering with us.
We see it as our responsibility to make that happen for each and every customer. This is how we will know we have executed on our vision. We view our dot on the magic quadrant today like a pin on a map. It marks an important place in our journey –one I believe we will look back on as a place where we stopped a moment to admire the view, and then shouldered our packs for the next stage of our ascent.
Rob Bernshteyn is CEO of Coupa.
As procurement becomes more strategic andmanages a greater percentage of organizational spend, it’s becoming more common for it to report to the finance organization. This makes sense. But I’m often surprised by how little procurement knows about finance and finance knows about procurement. It’s hard to work together well when the groups don’t understand each other.
Finance often doesn’t understand how measure, manage, or evaluate procurement’s performance and effectiveness. They don’t know how to determine what value they’re adding, if any. If that’s the case, it’s likely that procurement lacks credibility within the organization, making it harder for them to partner with finance
There’s something new on procurement’s radar. Yes, more budget would be nice, and so would an endless supply of talent, but those are not new to the list. According to the The CPO Agenda, Hackett Group’s annual study of key procurement issues, becoming a trusted advisor now tops the list of procurement’s
Analytics and big data projects are starting to appear on the radar screens of forward thinking procurement organizations. Many companies have a rich store of data to pull from, and procurement is well positioned to undertake these types of projects. Studies show that even small projects can yield big financial gains. Caution -
I was talking to an analyst the other day about two-minute rule, letting them quickly complete tasks and move on. To me, these are the kinds of things that add real business value and drive adoption.new software features we’ve developed to let people perform transactions directly from their email without having to register for, or log in to a system. I’m a fan of this kind of functionality, because it really helps people live by the
After reviewing this, the analyst made a comment to the effect that many product organizations in our industry are moving away from email, while we’re adding more email capabilities. The dialog that followed was around my view that what we’re really seeing is not the demise of email, but the birth of choice. A variety of options is what people need to be successful, because everybody works differently. I think email still matters, and businesses and product developers should not count it out. Here’s why.
A trend afoot?
For a few years now, people have been predicting the death of email, presumably to be replaced by some more collaborative means of communication. You know there’s a new trend afoot when people are saying things like, “My 16-year-old son doesn't use his email account.”
Yet email is still the most used application100 billion email messages sent daily. That dominance may diminish, but it’s hard to imagine that email will soon die and be replaced with something else.in any corporation, and email service providers are still reporting strong growth. There are over
Email is now just one of a multitude of ways to communicate and transact. To remain competitive in this era of choice, businesses must recognize that they have to connect with customers in many different ways, because there is no longer any one sure-fire way to reach and interact with everyone. That means thinking beyond specific tools or platforms to the needs of different people, and let those dictate the approach.
For example, Facebook was supposed to be one of the things that was going to replace email, but today’s 16-year old may not even have an account. The hip kids have all moved on to Snapchat, which makes perfect sense in world where youthful mistakes can live forever on the internet and become ammunition for cyberbullying.
A 16-year-old kid is in high school and doesn't have a job. Does he or she really need email? Snapchat, Whatsapp or plain old texting will do just fine. But I'm not certain they’d work for me professionally.
Best for business
But why should that be? The original genius of email was its speed - it allowed you to communicate instantaneously, which was a big deal in the days when interoffice memos could take hours or days to reach their intended recipients. Today, there are myriad ways to communicate instantly, most of which can fit in your hand, or even on your wrist.
Email, however, suits many business needs. It updates live throughout the day, and because there’s a lot of relevant content going there, you’re in that system throughout the day. Email is a suitable vehicle for attachments, consolidating different conversations into distinct threads, and it has straightforward and intuitive group messaging capabilities (which smart phones have only just started to figure out). From an employers' perspective, it's great because it's easy to monitor and leaves a clear virtual paper trail.
It's all about freedom of choice and giving people the right tool – or, more likely, their choice of tools for the job. It’s challenging for businesses to develop products and services and messages for all these platforms and various end-user populations. And at the same time, there’s a new opportunity to think beyond the medium to what it is that the customer wants and needs.
I would suggest that we all start with this question in mind: What is success for the end user? If you start with a clear definition of success, you can work backwards from there and choose from a whole palette of platforms and mediums for what it is you want to help people do. Email might well be among them. Email, web, app, SMS, wearables . . . consider them all and choose as many as you think you need to increase your rate of adoption and customer success. In this era of choice, options are the only thing that's not optional.
Donna Wilczek is vice president, product management at Coupa.
A few weeks ago, we featured an article by Susan Avery, Procurement Changes in the Past 10 Years in the Coupa Top 5. Avery, a longtime writer on the topics of purchasing and procurement, pulled together some interesting statistics on how procurement has changed over the past 10, and in some cases, 20 years.
These statistics came out of a research study she conducted last year for another, more in-depth article profiling the modern procurement professional. In some cases, she was able to draw additionally on a 1993 study by an earlier writer at mypurchasingcenter.com to give an even longer view. We thought it would be interesting to put her findings in a chart to show more clearly what’s changed – and what hasn’t - between then and now.
What's changed the most over the past decade or so is how much more educated people in procurement are, the increasing amount of financial responsibility they have, and the wider diversity of experience they're bringing to the role.
Perhaps most notable is the shift toward a greater alignment with finance. Not only are more people coming to procurement with a finance background, there's been a big jump in the percentage who report in to the CFO. Not surprising considering that 27% of procurement people in 2013 reported managing a budget in excess of $100 million.
Avery also observes that procurement professionals are working in a wider variety of industries today, based on her experience writing the Purchasing Magazine procurement salary survey for many years. Whereas ten years ago the majority worked in miscellaneous manufacturing, metalworking and process industries, today procurement professionals today work in a wider variety of industries including healthcare, education, pharmaceuticals, and financial services she says.
And, whereas before they bought a lot of commodities, today they source a wider range of goods and services, including IT, professional services and corporate travel.
The increased level of education and qualification, and the diversification of background and activities squares up with what Andrew Bartolini, managing partner and chief researchser at Ardent Partners called out in the most recent CPO Rising report as a new convergence around procurement as the go-to department for executing a wider variety of initiatives, including things that have not been traditionally part of the procurement role.
What's remained constant over the last decade or more are a familiar set of challenges: The shortage of talent, the need for technology and automation. Also the same: despite these challenges, roughly 80% say they would choose the profession again.
Read the full article by Susan Avery here.
If your supply chain looks the same in 10 years as it does now, you’re going to be in trouble, says globally recognized sourcing expert Andrew Bartolini. Why? Markets are moving fast, and products are becoming commoditized faster than ever before. Strategic sourcing can be a critical competitive differentiator.
And, the only way to be strategic is with e-sourcing software. Bartolini goes so far as to say that if you are doing sourcing without e-sourcing software, you cannot call it strategic sourcing.
I’ll put my stake in the ground right next to his. E-sourcing software makes all the processes associated with sourcing efficient and scalable, so you can source even more categories, and still have time to be strategic. Yet, even a lot of large companies I’ve worked with still do paper based sourcing. No matter how good your team or process is, it’s simply no match for what can be done with modern e-sourcing tools. Without them, you’ll stay mired in antiquated processes and fall behind your competition.
Let’s define e-sourcing: Sourcing using email, Excel, Word and shared documents cannot be considered e-sourcing. Yes, those are electronic tools, but they’re not particularly well suited to sourcing.
E-sourcing software is purpose built for the specific workflow of sourcing. It lets you easily aggregate information, protect company knowledge as people come and go, and create repeatable processes.
The most sophisticated e-sourcing software integrates into the procurementsystem to go beyond process automation and provide intelligence that helps you identify new opportunities and get more mileage out of the contracts you’ve negotiated.
New cloud companies are making e-sourcing software more cost-effective and easy to implement than ever, bringing automation within reach of more organizations, so it’s time to think about doing things differently than the way you’ve always done it. Today’s e-sourcing software lets you:
1. Cast a wider net
Because e-sourcing software makes processes more efficient and scalable, you and your team can start to get more strategic. Rather than spend time on the mechanics of sourcing (e.g. collecting bids into a spreadsheet for evaluation, notifying suppliers of deadlines), sourcing professionals can use their time focusing on strategy. You can widen your net, including more vendors and sourcing more categories than with manual processes.
The other way you can widen your net is by letting your end-users run very simple “3 bids and a buy” sourcing events without any training or assistance from the sourcing team. Today’s software is so easy to use you don’t have to be a pro to run an event. Both the strategic sourcing team and business users can be more efficient in finding cost savings for the organization. If your organization is on the cutting edge, you might even train some of your business users to run reverse auctions and be prepared to see some eye opening savings.
2. Improve supplier relationships
You can invite more suppliers, and e-sourcing software makes it easy for them to participate by only requiring one thing of them – an Internet connection. The best platforms won’t charge supplier fees or require registering on a network.
An e-sourcing platform brings consistency to the process, making it easier for suppliers to participate. It also provides for a much more transparent process. Everyone has equal access to information, eliminating suspicions of bias. All this leads to higher supplier participation and lays the groundwork for better relationships, both of which bring more value to the buyer.
3. Harness the power of the collective
Being strategic means scanning the horizon for sourcing opportunities. With integrated e-sourcing software that’s connected to all your company’s buying activities, you now have intelligence about past, planned and in flight purchases so that sourcing managers can be alerted about where to look for more sourcing opportunities.
For example, some department outside of headquarters all of a sudden orders 100 computers. It's under the threshold for procurement to look at, but it's a big enough spend that it might make sense to run a sourcing event to get better pricing. With an e-sourcing tool that's integrated, you could be alerted any time there’s an order over a certain value and stop the requisition before it gets to the supplier so that the sourcing team can come in and say, "Hey, can we spend a little time with you and source this to get you better pricing?"
Or, let’s say your system is integrated with expense management, and you start to notice a lot of people expensing the same new keyboard. Now you have an opportunity to source it and put it in the catalog at contracted pricing instead of having everyone buying it at their favorite store.
4. Integrate for scalability
The other advantage of an integrated e-sourcing system is on the back end, where you can easily flip the winning bid from a sourcing event directly to a requisition, contract, or catalog item. You don't have to retype everything to load into the catalog, or create a separate requisition or contract. You just push a button and all that information carries over.
For example, you could negotiate pricing for your entire office supplies catalog in your e-sourcing software, and then with a push of a button bring the new pricing right back into the catalog for your end-users to purchase from.
Even if you think you don’t procure a lot, or even if you’re already getting some savings, you could be getting so much more with e-sourcing software. And your people, instead of doing the work of calling and emailing and cutting and pasting and compiling can instead be doing more strategic activities.
E-sourcing software can help you transform sourcing from a back-office function to a source of competitive advantage. You can’t really be strategic without it.
Andy Chiang is the product manager for Coupa Sourcing and our resident expert on reverse auctions. He also enjoys sourcing honey from his home apiary. Prior to Coupa Andy worked in strategic sourcing and supply chain at Gap Inc.
Last spring, I bought a Tesla. You’re probably thinking two things. First,“Cool!” And second, “Expensive.”
Right on the first count, but wrong on the second. I’m not saying a Tesla is cheap, but you have to look beyond the price tag to understand its cost, and value, relative to competing cars.
This is what I do in my professional life: I help companies understand the business value and total cost of ownership (TCO) for enterprise software.
Hidden costs can make a product with a lower price tag more expensive in the long run. A higher-priced product may deliver a better result, yielding greater value and costing less over time, therefore justifying a higher initial price point. My job is to study at all of these factors and make detailed estimates so that customers can make a decision based on a multi-year TCO and value delivered.
Naturally, I did this exercise for myself before buying my Tesla. I’m not a wealthy enough guy to just say, “I want it” and go out and buy it. I had to convince my inner TCO guy.
Calculating TCO is hard for most of us. Two natural human tendencies get in the way: Short-term focus on up front costs, and the assumption that the value of all options will be equal. To overcome these tendencies, you need a disciplined process that is much the same for anything you buy. Here are five steps for calculating TCO like a pro.
1. Compare apples to apples
The goal of TCO analysis is all about drilling down to get as close as wecan to an apples to apples comparison, but you still have to be comparing products in a similar class.
The Tesla isn’t going to be for everyone; you have to be able to pay the up front costs and wait for the savings to fully phase in. If you’re in the market for a Camry or Kia there’s no way this comparison is going to work.
For the TCO calculation for my Tesla, I looked at the total cost of ownership over a five-year period as compared to other new luxury cars such as BMW, Lexus and Mercedes.
If you’re comparing software, you have to be comparing software in the same class as well. For that, you have to define your top success criteria and success metrics. After that, you need to compare only those technology solutions that help you achieve your goals in your desired timeframe.
2. Look for hidden costs
Hidden costs don’t appear on the price tag, but are incurred during the transaction or over the life of the item you’re buying. For cars, hidden costs include repairs and maintenance, taxes, licensing fees, interest on financing, insurance and fuel. In the case of the Tesla and other alternative fuel vehicles, you get tax rebates, so I guess you could call that a hidden benefit.
When you add these other costs projected out over time to the sticker price of the car, you get the estimated total cost of ownership for a given time period. Even two cars with the same sticker price will usually have a different total cost of ownership.
It’s the same with enterprise software, although it can be harder to find the hidden costs. People tend to assume that since they’ve given each vendor the same RFP or list of needs, every option will address those needs the same way. But, hidden fees for implementation, training, upgrades, customizations, ongoing support and additional seat licenses are common and usually have a material impact on TCO. You have to especially watch out for hidden costs that might kick in after the first one or two years.
One more aspect of hidden cost is the opportunity cost of different options. If you’re looking at two comparable technology solutions, and Option A delivers the intended value faster than the Option B, then the latter should be associated with a higher opportunity cost/penalty in your TCO analysis. Time to value matters and it should be a part of every comparative analysis.
3. Is the future cloudy?
Because of the cloud and the rise of the Internet of Things (IoT), products are no longer static. There’s now the possibility that even mundane products like thermostats and appliances will actually get better.
That’s true of the Tesla; it’s a cloud car and part of the IoT. It’s always hooked up to the wireless network at home, and every few months there's a software upgrade that happens overnight. In the morning, voila, a new feature is there.
For example, the Tesla has regenerative braking, without the traditional “creep” feature. If I take my foot off the brake, it doesn’t move forward like most cars do. But, if you come to a stop climbing a steep hill, the car used to behave like a manual transmission car, rolling backward when you took your foot off the brake.
Based on feedback from the user community, they did a software upgrade and the Tesla now has a feature where the car holds in place for ten seconds, long enough for the driver to move his or her foot over to the accelerator. The car got better, without drivers having to buy the next model.
The cloud has now become an important consideration for buying enterprise software, for the same reasons. Time horizons for innovations and upgrades are much faster, and they’re delivered automatically to all the owners of the product. The product roadmap is more compressed, and there’s an opportunity to deliver more value on a continual basis.
4. Account for the intangibles
It’s not possible to put a number on everything, for the car or the software, but intangible benefits should still be accounted for.
For example, I get to use the diamond lane in my Tesla, which saves about half an hour a day for my particular commute. I could calculate a dollar value for that based on my wages, but really what it does is give me back some more time to spend on my family or my health. It’s hard to put a dollar value on that, but it’s definitely a benefit.
I also like the idea of no emissions coming from the vehicle itself, but I think the jury’s still out on the environmental aspect—the batteries cause some pollution that may cancel out reduced emissions, so I left that out of the calculation.
If I were building a business case for enterprise software though, I would consider including the financial impact intangibles such as reduced processing times, which could free up people to be more strategic, or the ability for users to configure software themselves, which cuts down on the need for IT support. I’d also look at usability and user adoption and estimate the positive impact on end users.
5. Do the math
The Tesla is pretty cool, but a TCO guy can’t allow himself to be distracted by coolness. After you do all the research, you need to actually do the math.
Obviously that’s a more complicated equation for the software than the car. The Tesla community has created a number of TCO calculators specifically for the Tesla, so I was able to cheat a little bit. Repair and maintenance costs are already in there, so I really just needed to plug in my personal mileage estimates and electrical rates.
After all was said and done, the five year TCO for the Tesla came out comparable to buying luxury sedan whose sticker price was significantly lower, with greater savings if I hold the car even longer. That sealed the deal with my inner TCO guy, and I’ve never looked back since.
Amit Duvedi is Vice President, Business Strategy Value Management for Coupa.
Uh-oh. Looks like you received an invoice from a supplier via email, didn’t you? And now you’re wondering what to do with it. Do you print it out and archive it?
We recommend you be very, very careful. Electronic invoices are subject to complex and changing regulations, so you always have to keep the seven rules of e- invoicing in mind. Rule number one: You will be audited. Do you know what the rest are? Watch this Fight Club- inspired video from our dev team to find out.
Can't view video from this window? Try clicking here.
What separates the leaders from the followers? IBM's new procurement study calls out some specifics in words and pictures that have been part of the conversation on social channels in the past few weeks. What else separates leaders from the followers? They share their knowledge with others, this week in particular helping demystify the cloud and calling out supply chain challenges to watch out for. And, they think differently, as evidenced by PYMNTS interview with Karla Friede, CEO of B2B payments startup and Coupa partner NVoice Pay.
As Kanye West said, “There’s leaders, and there’s followers,” and . . . well, in the interest of propriety we’ll spare you the next line. But the opening line is just as true for procurement professionals as it is for entertainment supervillains, if you believe the results of IBM’s second in a series of procurement studies. IBM’s Institute for Business Value surveyed more than 1,000 CPOs around the world and found the qualities shared by top-performers - and the underachievers. Check it out to see where you, or your CPO ranks.
If picture books are your thing, you’ll love IBM’s infographic treatment of its 2014 CPO study. Does your CPO have the killer eyes to scope the big picture, or the sharp ears to listen and adapt? What about the iron stomach for the risks and pitfalls of the modern procurement landscape?
Today’s market is saturated with different types of cloud services. Cloud software has been around for more than two decades, yet we still use only one word - “cloud” - as an umbrella term (sorry, bad pun) for all SaaS models. In reality, cloud comes in many varieties. Understanding your options is half the battle. Tony DiBenedetto walks you through private, public and hybrid clouds, and how to decide which one is right for you.
Six challenges that could break the supply chain - Supply Chain
We don’t have to tell you that the supply chain landscape has changed radically over the past twenty years. Advances in communications alone have revolutionized the sector. But what lies ahead? Sam Jermy picks out six challenges that will make or break supply chain models down the road.
Making business payments smart - Pymnts.com
Paying suppliers on time is good for relationships, and early is even better when dynamic discounting is available. But how can your company apply its usual strategic rigor to a process seemingly as straightforward as paying the bills? NVoicepay CEO Karla Friede has an idea, and it starts with forgetting what you think you know about electronic payments. Death to the status quo!